|
Most Dominant Player between 1929 and 1932 |
See more details |
Alexander Alekhine: 2.7 years as #1 (between May 1929 and December 1931) |
The player who was ranked #1 most often between 1929 and 1932 was Alexander Alekhine, with 32 different months as the top-ranked player (a total of 2.7 years). Next on the list was José Capablanca (0.3 years), the only other player to be ranked #1 between 1929 and 1932. |
|
|
Highest-Rated Player between 1929 and 1932 |
Summary only | Top 5 | Top 10 | Top 20 | Top 50 | Top 100 |
Alexander Alekhine: 2860 (May 1931) |
|
|
|
Strongest Tournament between 1929 and 1932 |
See more details |
Karlsbad, 1929: Class 18 (#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10) |
|
|
Strongest Match between 1929 and 1932 |
See more details |
Alekhine-Bogoljubow I (World Championship, GER/NLD), 1929: #1 vs #4 |
|
|
Best Individual Event Performance between 1929 and 1932 |
Summary only | Top 5 | Top 10 | Top 20 | Top 50 | Top 100 |
Alexander Alekhine: 2865 in San Remo, 1930 |
|
|
Player Name |
Chessmetrics Performance Rating |
Event |
#1 | Alexander Alekhine | 2865 performance: 13/14 (93%) vs 2626 | San Remo, 1930 | #2 | Alexander Alekhine | 2859 performance: 19.5/24 (81%) vs 2644 | Bled, 1931 | #3 | Alexander Alekhine | 2819 performance: 15.5/25 (62%) vs 2738 | Alekhine-Bogoljubow I (World Championship, GER/NLD), 1929 | #4 | Rudolf Spielmann | 2791 performance: 14.5/20 (73%) vs 2645 | Karlsbad, 1929 | #5 | Aron Nimzowitsch | 2787 performance: 14.5/20 (73%) vs 2640 | Karlsbad, 1929 |
| #6 | José Capablanca | 2770 performance: 14/20 (70%) vs 2638 | Karlsbad, 1929 | #7 | Salo Flohr | 2760 performance: 7/8 (88%) vs 2609 | Hastings, 1931 | #8 | José Capablanca | 2746 performance: 10.5/13 (81%) vs 2574 | Budapest, 1929 | #9 | Aron Nimzowitsch | 2737 performance: 8.5/10 (85%) vs 2567 | Frankfurt, 1930 | #10 | José Capablanca | 2732 performance: 6/10 (60%) vs 2712 | Capablanca-Euwe Match (Amsterdam), 1931 |
|
|
NOTE: "Chessmetrics Performance Rating" is a Chessmetrics formula used to estimate the performance level of a player, based solely on the evidence of their results in one event. It only considers games against rated opposition, so the above summary excludes any games against unrated opponents. |