Event Details:   Hastings, 1895  
   Start Date:    August 5th, 1895
   Finish Date:    September 2nd, 1895
   Event Type:    Tournament
 Player Name   Rating on August 1895 list   Predicted Results vs Rated Opponents   Age 
 Harry Pillsbury   2621 (#20 on August 1895 list  7.6/17, 45%   22y8m 
 Mikhail Chigorin   2743 (#4 on August 1895 list  10.2/17, 60%   44y9m 
 Emanuel Lasker   2860 (#1 on August 1895 list  12.7/17, 74%   26y8m 
 Siegbert Tarrasch   2823 (#2 on August 1895 list  11.9/17, 70%   33y5m 
 Wilhelm Steinitz   2763 (#3 on August 1895 list  10.6/17, 62%   59y3m 
 Carl Schlechter   2613 (#22 on August 1895 list  7.4/17, 44%   21y5m 
 Emanuel Schiffers   2630 (#17 on August 1895 list  7.8/17, 46%   45y3m 
 Dawid Janowsky   2643 (#14 on August 1895 list  8.1/17, 47%   27y2m 
 Curt von Bardeleben   2708 (#7 on August 1895 list  9.4/17, 56%   34y5m 
 Richard Teichmann   2713 (#6 on August 1895 list  9.5/17, 56%   26y8m 
 James Mason   2568 (#32 on August 1895 list  6.5/17, 38%   45y9m 
 Isidor Gunsberg   not rated on August 1895 list   -   40y9m 
 Georg Marco   2657 (#13 on August 1895 list  8.4/17, 49%   31y9m 
 Carl Walbrodt   2678 (#9 on August 1895 list  8.8/17, 52%   23y9m 
 Joseph Blackburne   2701 (#8 on August 1895 list  9.3/17, 55%   53y8m 
 Amos Burn   not rated on August 1895 list   -   46y8m 
 Adolf Albin   2643 (#15 on August 1895 list  8.1/17, 47%   46y11m 
 William Pollock   2462 (#65 on August 1895 list  4.2/17, 25%   36y6m 
 Henry Bird   2504 (#52 on August 1895 list  5.1/17, 30%   65y1m 
 Jacques Mieses   2617 (#21 on August 1895 list  7.5/17, 44%   30y6m 
 Samuel Tinsley   not rated on August 1895 list   -   48y7m 
 Beniamino Vergani   not rated on August 1895 list   -   32y2m 
 
 Player Name   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   Performance Rating   Results +/- Predicted 
 Harry Pillsbury   +12 (16.5/21, 79%)   +8 (12.5/17, 74%) vs 2666-rated opposition   2805   +4.9 
 Mikhail Chigorin   +11 (16/21, 76%)   +7 (12/17, 71%) vs 2659-rated opposition   2781   +1.8 
 Emanuel Lasker   +10 (15.5/21, 74%)   +6 (11.5/17, 68%) vs 2652-rated opposition   2757   -1.2 
 Siegbert Tarrasch   +7 (14/21, 67%)   +4 (10.5/17, 62%) vs 2654-rated opposition   2724   -1.4 
 Wilhelm Steinitz   +5 (13/21, 62%)   +2 (9.5/17, 56%) vs 2658-rated opposition   2692   -1.1 
 Carl Schlechter   +1 (11/21, 52%)   = (8.5/17, 50%) vs 2667-rated opposition   2664   +1.1 
 Emanuel Schiffers   +3 (12/21, 57%)   = (8.5/17, 50%) vs 2666-rated opposition   2663   +0.7 
 Dawid Janowsky   -2 (9.5/21, 45%)   = (8.5/17, 50%) vs 2665-rated opposition   2662   +0.4 
 Curt von Bardeleben   +2 (11.5/21, 55%)   = (8.5/17, 50%) vs 2661-rated opposition   2659   -0.9 
 Richard Teichmann   +2 (11.5/21, 55%)   = (8.5/17, 50%) vs 2661-rated opposition   2659   -1.0 
 James Mason   -2 (9.5/21, 45%)   -2 (7.5/17, 44%) vs 2669-rated opposition   2631   +1.0 
 Isidor Gunsberg   -3 (9/21, 43%)   -2 (8/18, 44%) vs 2664-rated opposition   2629   N/A 
 Georg Marco   -4 (8.5/21, 40%)   -2 (7.5/17, 44%) vs 2664-rated opposition   2626   -0.9 
 Carl Walbrodt   -1 (10/21, 48%)   -2 (7.5/17, 44%) vs 2663-rated opposition   2625   -1.3 
 Joseph Blackburne   = (10.5/21, 50%)   -2 (7.5/17, 44%) vs 2662-rated opposition   2624   -1.8 
 Amos Burn   -2 (9.5/21, 45%)   -3 (7.5/18, 42%) vs 2664-rated opposition   2612   N/A 
 Adolf Albin   -4 (8.5/21, 40%)   -3 (7/17, 41%) vs 2665-rated opposition   2609   -1.1 
 William Pollock   -5 (8/21, 38%)   -5 (6/17, 35%) vs 2676-rated opposition   2583   +1.8 
 Henry Bird   -3 (9/21, 43%)   -5 (6/17, 35%) vs 2673-rated opposition   2581   +0.9 
 Jacques Mieses   -6 (7.5/21, 36%)   -6 (5.5/17, 32%) vs 2667-rated opposition   2557   -2.0 
 Samuel Tinsley   -6 (7.5/21, 36%)   -7 (5.5/18, 31%) vs 2664-rated opposition   2544   N/A 
 Beniamino Vergani   -15 (3/21, 14%)   -14 (2/18, 11%) vs 2664-rated opposition   2425   N/A