Event Details:   Paris, 1892  
   Start Date:    1892
   Finish Date:    -
   Event Type:    Tournament
 Player Name   Rating on January 1892 list   Predicted Results vs Rated Opponents   Age 
 Goetz, Alphonse   not rated on January 1892 list   -      - 
 Stanislaus Sittenfeld   2474 (#57 on January 1892 list  0.4/1, 41%   26y6m 
 Dawid Janowsky   not rated on January 1892 list   -   23y7m 
 Albert Clerc   not rated on January 1892 list   -   62y0m 
 Jean Taubenhaus   2555 (#30 on January 1892 list  0.6/1, 59%   41y1m 
 Weismann   not rated on January 1892 list   -      - 
 Levy   not rated on January 1892 list   -      - 
 Jules de Rivière   not rated on January 1892 list   -   61y8m 
 Alexandre   not rated on January 1892 list   -      - 
 Kann   not rated on January 1892 list   -      - 
 Denouroy   not rated on January 1892 list   -      - 
 Rondeau   not rated on January 1892 list   -      - 
 
 Player Name   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   Performance Rating   Results +/- Predicted 
 Goetz, Alphonse   +16 (18.5/21, 88%)   +3 (3/3, 100%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2621]   N/A 
 Stanislaus Sittenfeld   +11 (16/21, 76%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2555-rated opposition   [2502]   +0.1 
 Dawid Janowsky   +12 (16.5/21, 79%)   = (1.5/3, 50%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2493]   N/A 
 Albert Clerc   +10 (15.5/21, 74%)   = (1.5/3, 50%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2493]   N/A 
 Jean Taubenhaus   +1 (6/11, 55%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2474-rated opposition   [2452]   -0.1 
 Weismann   = (10.5/21, 50%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2451]   N/A 
 Levy   -14 (3.5/21, 17%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2451]   N/A 
 Jules de Rivière   +6 (13.5/21, 64%)   -2 (0.5/3, 17%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2408]   N/A 
 Alexandre   -5 (8/21, 38%)   -2 (0.5/3, 17%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2408]   N/A 
 Kann   -9 (6/21, 29%)   -3 (0/3, 0%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2366]   N/A 
 Denouroy   -12 (4.5/21, 21%)   -3 (0/3, 0%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2366]   N/A 
 Rondeau   -16 (2.5/21, 12%)   -3 (0/3, 0%) vs 2515-rated opposition   [2366]   N/A