| Player Name |
Rating on August 1888 list |
Predicted Results vs Rated Opponents |
Age |
| Isidor Gunsberg |
2719 (#3 on August 1888 list) |
8.6/13, 66% |
33y9m |
| George Mackenzie |
2676 (#6 on August 1888 list) |
7.9/13, 61% |
51y5m |
| Curt von Bardeleben |
2677 (#5 on August 1888 list) |
7.9/13, 61% |
27y5m |
| James Mason |
2581 (#17 on August 1888 list) |
6.3/13, 49% |
38y9m |
| Amos Burn |
2664 (#7 on August 1888 list) |
7.7/13, 59% |
39y8m |
| Joseph Blackburne |
2747 (#2 on August 1888 list) |
9/13, 70% |
46y8m |
| Miksa Weiss |
2696 (#4 on August 1888 list) |
8.2/13, 63% |
31y1m |
| Edmund Thorold |
2434 (#54 on August 1888 list) |
3.9/13, 30% |
55y11m |
| Jean Taubenhaus |
2544 (#30 on August 1888 list) |
5.7/13, 44% |
37y8m |
| Charles Locock |
not rated on August 1888 list |
- |
25y11m |
| William Pollock |
2523 (#33 on August 1888 list) |
5.4/13, 41% |
29y6m |
| Henry Bird |
2566 (#22 on August 1888 list) |
6.1/13, 47% |
58y1m |
| John Owen |
2559 (#23 on August 1888 list) |
6/13, 46% |
61y4m |
| James Mortimer |
2396 (#60 on August 1888 list) |
3.3/13, 25% |
55y4m |
| Francis Lee |
2508 (#36 on August 1888 list) |
5.1/13, 39% |
31y7m |
| John Hall |
not rated on August 1888 list |
- |
35y0m |
| Alfred Rumboll |
not rated on August 1888 list |
- |
51y7m |
| Player Name |
Overall Results |
Actual Results vs Rated Opponents |
Performance Rating |
Results +/- Predicted |
| Isidor Gunsberg |
+11 (13.5/16, 84%) |
+8 (10.5/13, 81%) vs 2582-rated opposition |
2753 |
+1.9 |
| George Mackenzie |
+8 (12/16, 75%) |
+5 (9/13, 69%) vs 2586-rated opposition |
2692 |
+1.1 |
| Curt von Bardeleben |
+6 (11/16, 69%) |
+4 (8.5/13, 65%) vs 2586-rated opposition |
2671 |
+0.6 |
| James Mason |
+6 (11/16, 69%) |
+3 (8/13, 62%) vs 2593-rated opposition |
2656 |
+1.7 |
| Amos Burn |
+5 (10.5/16, 66%) |
+2 (7.5/13, 58%) vs 2587-rated opposition |
2629 |
-0.2 |
| Joseph Blackburne |
+4 (10/16, 63%) |
+2 (7.5/13, 58%) vs 2580-rated opposition |
2624 |
-1.5 |
| Miksa Weiss |
+4 (10/16, 63%) |
+1 (7/13, 54%) vs 2584-rated opposition |
2606 |
-1.2 |
| Edmund Thorold |
-3 (6.5/16, 41%) |
-1 (6/13, 46%) vs 2604-rated opposition |
2580 |
+2.1 |
| Jean Taubenhaus |
+2 (9/16, 56%) |
-1 (6/13, 46%) vs 2596-rated opposition |
2573 |
+0.3 |
| Charles Locock |
-3 (6.5/16, 41%) |
-3 (5.5/14, 39%) vs 2592-rated opposition |
2533 |
N/A |
| William Pollock |
-2 (7/16, 44%) |
-3 (5/13, 38%) vs 2597-rated opposition |
2532 |
-0.4 |
| Henry Bird |
-2 (7/16, 44%) |
-3 (5/13, 38%) vs 2594-rated opposition |
2529 |
-1.1 |
| John Owen |
-6 (5/16, 31%) |
-5 (4/13, 31%) vs 2595-rated opposition |
2487 |
-2.0 |
| James Mortimer |
-5 (5.5/16, 34%) |
-6 (3.5/13, 27%) vs 2607-rated opposition |
2477 |
+0.2 |
| Francis Lee |
-6 (5/16, 31%) |
-6 (3.5/13, 27%) vs 2599-rated opposition |
2469 |
-1.6 |
| John Hall |
-9 (3.5/16, 22%) |
-9 (2.5/14, 18%) vs 2592-rated opposition |
2411 |
N/A |
| Alfred Rumboll |
-10 (3/16, 19%) |
-10 (2/14, 14%) vs 2592-rated opposition |
2391 |
N/A |