Event Details:   New York, 1889  
   Start Date:    March 25th, 1889
   Finish Date:    May 27th, 1889
   Event Type:    Tournament
 Player Name   Rating on March 1889 list   Predicted Results vs Rated Opponents   Age 
 Mikhail Chigorin   2675 (#5 on March 1889 list  17.4/29, 60%   38y4m 
 Joseph Blackburne   2728 (#3 on March 1889 list  20.1/30, 67%   47y3m 
 Miksa Weiss   2671 (#7 on March 1889 list  19.1/32, 60%   31y8m 
 Isidor Gunsberg   2732 (#2 on March 1889 list  20.9/31, 67%   34y4m 
 Samuel Lipschütz   2574 (#20 on March 1889 list  14.2/30, 47%   25y8m 
 Amos Burn   2651 (#8 on March 1889 list  16.6/29, 57%   40y3m 
 William Pollock   2520 (#31 on March 1889 list  11.4/28, 41%   30y1m 
 James Mason   2615 (#15 on March 1889 list  16.8/32, 53%   39y4m 
 Henry Bird   2542 (#28 on March 1889 list  11.3/26, 43%   58y8m 
 Max Judd   2455 (#50 on March 1889 list  8.4/26, 32%   37y3m 
 George Gossip   not rated on March 1889 list   -   47y3m 
 Jean Taubenhaus   2563 (#22 on March 1889 list  14.2/31, 46%   38y3m 
 Eugene Delmar   2630 (#11 on March 1889 list  15.2/28, 54%   47y6m 
 Constant Burille   not rated on March 1889 list   -   22y7m 
 David Baird   2474 (#41 on March 1889 list  10.4/30, 35%   34y3m 
 Jackson Showalter   not rated on March 1889 list   -   29y1m 
 J Moore Hanham   2497 (#37 on March 1889 list  12/32, 38%   49y2m 
 Dion Martinez   not rated on March 1889 list   -   51y9m 
 John Baird   not rated on March 1889 list   -   37y1m 
 Nicholas MacLeod   not rated on March 1889 list   -   19y1m 
 
 Player Name   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   Performance Rating   Results +/- Predicted 
 Mikhail Chigorin   +20 (31/42, 74%)   +11 (20/29, 69%) vs 2589-rated opposition   2737   +2.6 
 Joseph Blackburne   +16 (29.5/43, 69%)   +9 (19.5/30, 65%) vs 2584-rated opposition   2708   -0.6 
 Miksa Weiss   +20 (32.5/45, 72%)   +9 (20.5/32, 64%) vs 2589-rated opposition   2708   +1.4 
 Isidor Gunsberg   +19 (31/43, 72%)   +9 (20/31, 65%) vs 2584-rated opposition   2705   -0.9 
 Samuel Lipschütz   +13 (28/43, 65%)   +4 (17/30, 57%) vs 2596-rated opposition   2661   +2.8 
 Amos Burn   +14 (28/42, 67%)   +4 (16.5/29, 57%) vs 2590-rated opposition   2656   -0.1 
 William Pollock   -3 (19/41, 46%)   -2 (13/28, 46%) vs 2600-rated opposition   2593   +1.6 
 James Mason   +6 (26.5/47, 56%)   -2 (15/32, 47%) vs 2593-rated opposition   2592   -1.8 
 Henry Bird   -3 (18/39, 46%)   -3 (11.5/26, 44%) vs 2599-rated opposition   2576   +0.2 
 Max Judd   +1 (19.5/38, 51%)   -6 (10/26, 38%) vs 2606-rated opposition   2543   +1.6 
 George Gossip   -11 (17/45, 38%)   -7 (12.5/32, 39%) vs 2595-rated opposition   2539   N/A 
 Jean Taubenhaus   -4 (19.5/43, 45%)   -7 (12/31, 39%) vs 2597-rated opposition   2538   -2.2 
 Eugene Delmar   -3 (19.5/42, 46%)   -6 (11/28, 39%) vs 2592-rated opposition   2537   -4.2 
 Constant Burille   -8 (17.5/43, 41%)   -8 (11/30, 37%) vs 2595-rated opposition   2522   N/A 
 David Baird   -6 (19/44, 43%)   -9 (10.5/30, 35%) vs 2604-rated opposition   2519   +0.1 
 Jackson Showalter   -1 (19/39, 49%)   -8 (10/28, 36%) vs 2595-rated opposition   2515   N/A 
 J Moore Hanham   -10 (18/46, 39%)   -11 (10.5/32, 33%) vs 2602-rated opposition   2502   -1.5 
 Dion Martinez   -11 (16/43, 37%)   -14 (9/32, 28%) vs 2595-rated opposition   2463   N/A 
 John Baird   -24 (10/44, 23%)   -20 (6/32, 19%) vs 2595-rated opposition   2397   N/A 
 Nicholas MacLeod   -25 (7.5/40, 19%)   -23 (3.5/30, 12%) vs 2595-rated opposition   2350   N/A