1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Eugene Znosko-Borovsky
   Born:    1884-Aug
   Died:    1954-Dec
   Best World Rank:    #17 (3 different months between the May 1916 rating list and the July 1916 rating list )
   Highest Rating:    2613 on the December 1914 rating list, #18 in world, age 30y4m
   Best Individual Performance:    2608 in Ostend, 1907, scoring 10/20 (50%) vs 2598-rated opposition

  (no graph available)   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
    Event Name  Rating   Performance   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   +/- Predicted 
    RUS-ch03 Kiev, 1903  not rated on January 1903 list   [2534]   +4 (11/18, 61%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2691-rated opposition   N/A 
    Schiffers-Znosko-Borovsky Match (St Petersburg), 1904  not rated on January 1904 list   -   -1 (1.5/4, 38%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    St Petersburg, 1905  not rated on January 1905 list   [2554]   +5 (10.5/16, 66%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2723-rated opposition   N/A 
    Nuremberg, 1906  not rated on January 1906 list   2592   -1 (7.5/16, 47%)   -1 (6.5/14, 46%) vs 2614-rated opposition   N/A 
    Ostend, 1906  not rated on January 1906 list   [2575]   +1 (3.5/6, 58%)   = (2/4, 50%) vs 2619-rated opposition   N/A 

    Ostend, 1907  2579 (#26 on January 1907 list  2608   +2 (15/28, 54%)   = (10/20, 50%) vs 2598-rated opposition   +0.5 
    St. Petersburg, 1909  2588 (#25 on January 1909 list  2495   -8 (5/18, 28%)   -9 (3.5/16, 22%) vs 2666-rated opposition   -3.0 
    Alekhine-Znosko-Borovsky I (Moscow-St Petersburg), 1911  2520 (#32 on January 1911 list  [2545]   = (0.5/1, 50%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2623-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Alekhine-Znosko-Borovsky II (Moscow-St Petersburg), 1912  2520 (#45 on April 1912 list  [2578]   = (0.5/1, 50%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2676-rated opposition   +0.2 
    St Petersburg2, 1913  not rated on January 1913 list   [2511]   = (0.5/1, 50%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2569-rated opposition   N/A 

    St Petersburg, 1913  not rated on April 1913 list   [2559]   -1 (0.5/2, 25%)   -1 (0.5/2, 25%) vs 2695-rated opposition   N/A 
    St. Petersburg, 1914  not rated on January 1914 list   [2608]   +5 (6.5/8, 81%)   +1 (2/3, 67%) vs 2618-rated opposition   N/A 
    London, 1922  not rated on July 1922 list   2562   -5 (5/15, 33%)   -3 (3.5/10, 35%) vs 2658-rated opposition   N/A 
    Scheveningen, 1923  2477 (#41 on January 1923 list  2504   +1 (5.5/10, 55%)   +2 (4.5/7, 64%) vs 2427-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Weston, 1924  2464 (#53 on January 1924 list  2586   +4 (6.5/9, 72%)   +3 (4.5/6, 75%) vs 2488-rated opposition   +1.7 

    Paris, 1925  2527 (#34 on January 1925 list  2597   = (4/8, 50%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2618-rated opposition   +0.9 
    Birmingham, 1926  2546 (#34 on January 1926 list  [2394]   = (2.5/5, 50%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2434-rated opposition   -0.9 
    Scarborough-B, 1926  2546 (#34 on January 1926 list  [2403]   +1 (3.5/6, 58%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2447-rated opposition   -0.8 
    Budapest, 1926  2543 (#34 on June 1926 list  2472   -6 (4.5/15, 30%)   -4 (4.5/13, 35%) vs 2552-rated opposition   -1.9 
    Tunbridge Wells, 1927  2477 (#64 on January 1927 list  2429   -3 (2/7, 29%)   -3 (2/7, 29%) vs 2525-rated opposition   -1.1 

    Cheltenham, 1928  2451 (#87 on April 1928 list  2457   +1 (4/7, 57%)   -1 (2/5, 40%) vs 2499-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Paris, 1929  2442 (#118 on January 1929 list  [2602]   +3 (4.5/6, 75%)   +3 (3.5/4, 88%) vs 2496-rated opposition   +1.8 
    Ramsgate, 1929  2455 (#106 on April 1929 list  2473   = (3.5/7, 50%)   -1 (2/5, 40%) vs 2520-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Nice, 1930  2505 (#66 on January 1930 list  2597   +5 (8/11, 73%)   +2 (5/8, 63%) vs 2547-rated opposition   +1.4 
    Nice, 1931  2574 (#32 on January 1931 list  2497   = (4.5/9, 50%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2492-rated opposition   -0.8 

    Paris, 1933  2511 (#55 on January 1933 list  [2514]   = (3.5/7, 50%)   -1 (1.5/4, 38%) vs 2589-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Tatatovaros, 1935  not rated on July 1935 list   2440   -4 (6.5/17, 38%)   -3 (2.5/8, 31%) vs 2528-rated opposition   N/A 
    Paris, 1938  not rated on January 1938 list   [2589]   -1 (0.5/2, 25%)   -1 (0.5/2, 25%) vs 2740-rated opposition   N/A 
    Paris L'Echiquier, 1938  not rated on January 1938 list   [2447]   +2 (8/14, 57%)   = (1/2, 50%) vs 2456-rated opposition   N/A 
    Zaanstreek, 1946  not rated on January 1946 list   [2453]   -6 (2.5/11, 23%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2517-rated opposition   N/A 

    Baarn-C, 1947  2383 (#224 on May 1947 list  [2355]   -1 (0.5/2, 25%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2405-rated opposition   -0.5