1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Frederick Yates
   Born:    1884-Jan
   Died:    1932-Nov
   Best World Rank:    #17 (4 different months between the January 1925 rating list and the July 1925 rating list )
   Highest Rating:    2596 on the January 1925 rating list, #17 in world, age 41y0m
   Best Individual Performance:    2699 in Karlsbad, 1923, scoring 9/15 (60%) vs 2646-rated opposition
  (no graph available)   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
    Event Name  Rating   Performance   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   +/- Predicted 
    Schories-Yates Match (Blackpool), 1910  not rated on January 1910 list   -   +4 (4/4, 100%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Hamburg, 1910  not rated on January 1910 list   2473   -10 (3.5/17, 21%)   -8 (2.5/13, 19%) vs 2653-rated opposition   N/A 
    ENG-USA cable m, 1910  not rated on January 1910 list   -   +1 (1/1, 100%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    ENG-USA cable m, 1911  2503 (#35 on January 1911 list)   -   +1 (1/1, 100%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Bad Pistyan, 1912  2499 (#42 on January 1912 list)   2547   -5 (6/17, 35%)   -4 (3.5/11, 32%) vs 2658-rated opposition   +0.1 
    London, 1912  2499 (#42 on January 1912 list)   [2538]   +1 (1.5/2, 75%)   +1 (1.5/2, 75%) vs 2522-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Scheveningen, 1913  2513 (#52 on July 1913 list)   2694   +4 (8.5/13, 65%)   +4 (4.5/5, 90%) vs 2579-rated opposition   +2.4 
    Hastings Victory Congress, 1919  not rated on August 1919 list   [2563]   +3 (7/11, 64%)   -2 (0/2, 0%) vs 2771-rated opposition   N/A 
    Hastings 2021, 1920  not rated on January 1920 list   -   +2 (4/6, 67%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Wahltuch-Yates Match (Manchester), 1921  not rated on January 1921 list   -   -2 (1/4, 25%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    The Hague, 1921  not rated on January 1921 list   2407   -7 (1/9, 11%)   -7 (0/7, 0%) vs 2652-rated opposition   N/A 
    Hastings 2122, 1921  2446 (#41 on December 1921 list)   [2442]   = (3.5/7, 50%)   -2 (0/2, 0%) vs 2590-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Hastings, 1922  2431 (#41 on January 1922 list)   2581   -5 (2.5/10, 25%)   -3 (2.5/8, 31%) vs 2704-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Weston, 1922  2431 (#41 on January 1922 list)   [2635]   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +1 (1.5/2, 75%) vs 2667-rated opposition   +1.1 
    London, 1922  2463 (#47 on July 1922 list)   2598   +1 (8/15, 53%)   -2 (3.5/9, 39%) vs 2679-rated opposition   +1.3 
    Hastings 2223, 1922  2513 (#28 on December 1922 list)   [2568]   = (4.5/9, 50%)   -1 (0.5/2, 25%) vs 2709-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Scheveningen, 1923  2524 (#25 on January 1923 list)   2534   +4 (7/10, 70%)   +3 (5/7, 71%) vs 2427-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Trieste, 1923  2524 (#25 on January 1923 list)   [2484]   +4 (7.5/11, 68%)   = (1.5/3, 50%) vs 2501-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Liverpool, 1923  2514 (#27 on March 1923 list)   2555   +4 (6.5/9, 72%)   = (2.5/5, 50%) vs 2582-rated opposition   +0.4 
    Karlsbad, 1923  2516 (#27 on April 1923 list)   2699   +2 (9.5/17, 56%)   +3 (9/15, 60%) vs 2646-rated opposition   +3.8 
    Hastings, 1923  2562 (#26 on December 1923 list)   2632   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +4 (6/8, 75%) vs 2520-rated opposition   +1.6 
    New York, 1924  2571 (#24 on March 1924 list)   2556   -6 (7/20, 35%)   -7 (5.5/18, 31%) vs 2677-rated opposition   -1.3 
    Hastings, 1924  2583 (#21 on December 1924 list)   2597   +5 (6.5/8, 81%)   +4 (5.5/7, 79%) vs 2469-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Baden-Baden, 1925  2596 (#17 on January 1925 list)   2536   -4 (8/20, 40%)   -5 (5.5/16, 34%) vs 2628-rated opposition   -1.9 
    Marienbad, 1925  2596 (#17 on January 1925 list)   2592   -1 (7/15, 47%)   -1 (6/13, 46%) vs 2617-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Hastings, 1925  2596 (#17 on January 1925 list)   2522   -1 (4/9, 44%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2523-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Moscow, 1925  2580 (#21 on November 1925 list)   2528   -6 (7/20, 35%)   -6 (4/14, 29%) vs 2657-rated opposition   -1.7 
    Dresden, 1926  2558 (#27 on January 1926 list)   2537   -3 (3/9, 33%)   -2 (3/8, 38%) vs 2613-rated opposition   -0.5 
    Ghent, 1926  2558 (#27 on January 1926 list)   2565   +1 (5.5/10, 55%)   +1 (4.5/8, 56%) vs 2542-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Meran, 1926  2558 (#27 on January 1926 list)   2554   +3 (8/13, 62%)   = (3/6, 50%) vs 2575-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Semmering, 1926  2558 (#27 on January 1926 list)   2542   -3 (7/17, 41%)   -3 (5.5/14, 39%) vs 2603-rated opposition   -0.8 
    Budapest, 1926  2557 (#27 on June 1926 list)   2535   -3 (6/15, 40%)   -1 (6/13, 46%) vs 2551-rated opposition   -0.6 
    Hastings, 1926  2540 (#41 on December 1926 list)   2524   +2 (5.5/9, 61%)   = (3/6, 50%) vs 2535-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Homburg, 1927  2554 (#37 on January 1927 list)   [2545]   -3 (1/5, 20%)   -2 (1/4, 25%) vs 2683-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Kecskemet, 1927  2554 (#37 on January 1927 list)   2501   -3 (3/9, 33%)   -2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2590-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Kecskemet-S2, 1927  2554 (#37 on January 1927 list)   [2564]   +3 (5/7, 71%)   = (2/4, 50%) vs 2604-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Scarborough, 1927  2554 (#37 on January 1927 list)   2559   +2 (5.5/9, 61%)   +1 (3/5, 60%) vs 2540-rated opposition   +0.4 
    Tunbridge Wells, 1927  2554 (#37 on January 1927 list)   2602   +3 (5/7, 71%)   +3 (5/7, 71%) vs 2514-rated opposition   +1.2 
    London ol (Men), 1927  2550 (#37 on July 1927 list)   [2561]   +1 (3/5, 60%)   = (1/2, 50%) vs 2627-rated opposition   +0.2 
    London, 1927  2552 (#36 on October 1927 list)   2488   -4 (3.5/11, 32%)   -5 (2/9, 22%) vs 2642-rated opposition   -1.5 
    Hastings, 1927  2552 (#35 on December 1927 list)   2555   +1 (5/9, 56%)   +1 (5/9, 56%) vs 2528-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Scarborough, 1928  2557 (#34 on January 1928 list)   2568   +1 (5/9, 56%)   +2 (4/6, 67%) vs 2508-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Hastings 2829, 1928  2557 (#34 on January 1928 list)   2539   +1 (5/9, 56%)   +1 (5/9, 56%) vs 2509-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Cheltenham, 1928  2561 (#36 on April 1928 list)   2440   = (3.5/7, 50%)   -1 (2/5, 40%) vs 2477-rated opposition   -1.0 
    Bad Kissingen, 1928  2558 (#41 on August 1928 list)   2632   -1 (5/11, 45%)   -1 (5/11, 45%) vs 2675-rated opposition   +1.0 
    Ramsgate, 1929  2570 (#33 on April 1929 list)   2583   -1 (3/7, 43%)   = (2.5/5, 50%) vs 2621-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Karlsbad, 1929  2578 (#26 on July 1929 list)   2606   -2 (9.5/21, 45%)   -3 (8.5/20, 43%) vs 2650-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Barcelona, 1929  2578 (#26 on September 1929 list)   2493   +1 (7.5/14, 54%)   -1 (3.5/8, 44%) vs 2522-rated opposition   -1.0 
    Hastings, 1929  2573 (#29 on December 1929 list)   2585   +1 (5/9, 56%)   +1 (5/9, 56%) vs 2565-rated opposition   +0.4 
    San Remo, 1930  2581 (#27 on January 1930 list)   2677   +3 (9/15, 60%)   +2 (8/14, 57%) vs 2643-rated opposition   +2.0 
    Scarborough, 1930  2581 (#27 on January 1930 list)   2540   -2 (4.5/11, 41%)   -1 (4.5/10, 45%) vs 2569-rated opposition   -0.6 
    Canterbury, 1930  2583 (#25 on April 1930 list)   2485   +2 (4.5/7, 64%)   = (2.5/5, 50%) vs 2489-rated opposition   -0.6 
    Hamburg ol (Men), 1930  2580 (#26 on July 1930 list)   [2517]   -1 (3/7, 43%)   = (2/4, 50%) vs 2540-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Hastings, 1930  2576 (#30 on December 1930 list)   2548   = (4.5/9, 50%)   -1 (3.5/8, 44%) vs 2592-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Prague ol (Men), 1931  2575 (#27 on July 1931 list)   2560   -1 (3.5/8, 44%)   = (2.5/5, 50%) vs 2589-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Hastings, 1931  2557 (#45 on December 1931 list)   2601   -1 (4/9, 44%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2622-rated opposition   +0.6 
    London (BCF Championship), 1932  2557 (#43 on January 1932 list)   2488   +1 (6/11, 55%)   -1 (2/5, 40%) vs 2541-rated opposition   -0.6 
    Cambridge, 1932  2554 (#42 on March 1932 list)   2510   -1 (3/7, 43%)   = (3/6, 50%) vs 2516-rated opposition   -0.3