1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Jacques Mieses
   Born:    1865-Feb
   Died:    1954-Feb
   Best World Rank:    #9 (on the January 1921 rating list)
   Highest Rating:    2660 on the August 1907 rating list, #11 in world, age 42y6m
   Best Individual Performance:    2764 in Ostend, 1907, scoring 15/20 (75%) vs 2596-rated opposition
  Graph   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
    Event Name  Rating   Performance   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   +/- Predicted 
    Hamburg, 1885  not rated on January 1885 list   -   -1 (3/7, 43%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Frankfurt, 1887  not rated on January 1887 list   -   +7 (10/13, 77%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Berlin, 1888  not rated on January 1888 list   [2558]   +6 (8.5/11, 77%)   +2 (3/4, 75%) vs 2489-rated opposition   N/A 
    Leipzig, 1888  not rated on January 1888 list   2596   +2 (4.5/7, 64%)   +2 (4.5/7, 64%) vs 2545-rated opposition   N/A 
    Nuremberg, 1888  not rated on January 1888 list   2588   +1 (5.5/10, 55%)   +1 (5.5/10, 55%) vs 2567-rated opposition   N/A 
    Breslau, 1889  2616 (#14 on July 1889 list)   2667   +4 (10.5/17, 62%)   +4 (10/16, 63%) vs 2588-rated opposition   +1.5 
    Lasker-Mieses Match (Leipzig), 1890  2657 (#11 on January 1890 list)   2495   -5 (1.5/8, 19%)   -5 (1.5/8, 19%) vs 2666-rated opposition   -2.4 
    Berlin, 1890  2636 (#12 on July 1890 list)   2541   -2 (3/8, 38%)   -1 (3/7, 43%) vs 2591-rated opposition   -0.9 
    Dresden, 1892  2591 (#18 on July 1892 list)   2512   -4 (6/16, 38%)   -3 (3.5/10, 35%) vs 2596-rated opposition   -1.4 
    Kiel, 1893  2535 (#42 on August 1893 list)   [2536]   -3 (2.5/8, 31%)   -1 (1.5/4, 38%) vs 2619-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Mieses-Walbrodt Match (Berlin), 1894  2525 (#51 on January 1894 list)   2674   = (6.5/13, 50%)   = (6.5/13, 50%) vs 2689-rated opposition   +2.5 
    Leipzig, 1894  2582 (#31 on September 1894 list)   2605   = (8.5/17, 50%)   -1 (5.5/12, 46%) vs 2637-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Mieses-Taubenhaus Match (Glasgow), 1895  2600 (#27 on January 1895 list)   2548   +1 (3/5, 60%)   +1 (3/5, 60%) vs 2526-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Mieses-Teichmann I (London), 1895  2600 (#27 on January 1895 list)   2553   -3 (1.5/6, 25%)   -3 (1.5/6, 25%) vs 2700-rated opposition   -0.8 
    Janowsky-Mieses Match (Paris), 1895  2600 (#27 on January 1895 list)   2633   = (7/14, 50%)   = (7/14, 50%) vs 2638-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Hastings, 1895  2617 (#21 on August 1895 list)   2557   -6 (7.5/21, 36%)   -6 (5.5/17, 32%) vs 2667-rated opposition   -2.0 
    Berlin, 1896  2581 (#23 on January 1896 list)   2571   -2 (2/6, 33%)   -2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2681-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Vienna, 1896  2581 (#23 on January 1896 list)   [2618]   = (2.5/5, 50%)   +1 (2.5/4, 63%) vs 2626-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Berlin, 1897  2587 (#27 on January 1897 list)   [2549]   +1 (3.5/6, 58%)   -1 (1.5/4, 38%) vs 2636-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Caro-Mieses Match (Berlin), 1897  2587 (#27 on January 1897 list)   -   +1 (5.5/10, 55%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Berlin, 1897  2601 (#26 on December 1897 list)   [2510]   -9 (1/11, 9%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2653-rated opposition   -0.4 
    London, 1899  2560 (#36 on January 1899 list)   [2428]   +4 (7.5/11, 68%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2482-rated opposition   -0.8 
    Paris, 1900  2461 (#65 on May 1900 list)   2682   +4 (12.5/21, 60%)   = (7.5/15, 50%) vs 2692-rated opposition   +4.1 
    Monte Carlo, 1901  2604 (#18 on January 1901 list)   2659   +1 (8/15, 53%)   +2 (7/12, 58%) vs 2622-rated opposition   +1.3 
    Hannover, 1902  2626 (#15 on January 1902 list)   2690   +5 (11/17, 65%)   +4 (8/12, 67%) vs 2606-rated opposition   +1.7 
    Monte Carlo, 1902  2626 (#15 on January 1902 list)   2639   -1 (11.5/24, 48%)   = (10/20, 50%) vs 2633-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Monte Carlo, 1903  2647 (#13 on January 1903 list)   2595   = (13/26, 50%)   -4 (9/22, 41%) vs 2647-rated opposition   -2.0 
    Coburg, 1904  2650 (#13 on January 1904 list)   2585   +1 (6.5/12, 54%)   = (3.5/7, 50%) vs 2607-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Monte Carlo, 1904  2650 (#13 on January 1904 list)   2597   +1 (5.5/10, 55%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2617-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Cambridge Springs, 1904  2653 (#14 on April 1904 list)   2670   -1 (7/15, 47%)   = (4.5/9, 50%) vs 2703-rated opposition   +0.5 
    Barmen, 1905  2642 (#13 on January 1905 list)   2522   -5 (5/15, 33%)   -5 (4/13, 31%) vs 2636-rated opposition   -2.6 
    Mieses-Napier Match (Hastings), 1905  2642 (#13 on January 1905 list)   2638   = (5/10, 50%)   = (5/10, 50%) vs 2658-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Mieses-Rubinstein I (Lodz), 1905  2642 (#13 on January 1905 list)   -   -2 (0/2, 0%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Leonhardt-Mieses Match (London), 1905  2642 (#13 on January 1905 list)   2661   +3 (4.5/6, 75%)   +3 (4.5/6, 75%) vs 2586-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Ostend, 1906  2639 (#14 on January 1906 list)   [2584]   +1 (2/3, 67%)   +1 (2/3, 67%) vs 2584-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Jaffe-Mieses Match (New York), 1907  2626 (#17 on January 1907 list)   -   -2 (0/2, 0%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Ostend, 1907  2626 (#17 on January 1907 list)   2764   +10 (19/28, 68%)   +10 (15/20, 75%) vs 2596-rated opposition   +4.3 
    Vienna, 1907  2626 (#17 on January 1907 list)   2740   +7 (10/13, 77%)   +5 (7.5/10, 75%) vs 2630-rated opposition   +2.5 
    Karlsbad, 1907  2660 (#11 on August 1907 list)   2551   -5 (7.5/20, 38%)   -5 (6.5/18, 36%) vs 2633-rated opposition   -3.1 
    Marshall-Mieses Match (Berlin), 1908  2655 (#12 on January 1908 list)   2642   -1 (4.5/10, 45%)   -1 (4.5/10, 45%) vs 2694-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Prague, 1908  2655 (#12 on January 1908 list)   2600   -2 (8.5/19, 45%)   -2 (6.5/15, 43%) vs 2643-rated opposition   -1.2 
    Vienna, 1908  2655 (#12 on January 1908 list)   2630   +1 (10/19, 53%)   = (8.5/17, 50%) vs 2628-rated opposition   -0.5 
    Duesseldorf, 1908  2644 (#14 on August 1908 list)   2662   +2 (8.5/15, 57%)   +4 (7/10, 70%) vs 2566-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Mieses-Rubinstein II (GER), 1909  2634 (#16 on January 1909 list)   2671   -2 (4/10, 40%)   -2 (4/10, 40%) vs 2759-rated opposition   +0.5 
    St. Petersburg, 1909  2634 (#16 on January 1909 list)   2640   = (9.5/19, 50%)   -1 (7.5/16, 47%) vs 2663-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Mieses-Teichmann II (Berlin), 1910  2640 (#16 on January 1910 list)   2508   -5 (1/7, 14%)   -5 (1/7, 14%) vs 2703-rated opposition   -2.0 
    Mieses-Spielmann Match (Regensburg), 1910  2640 (#16 on January 1910 list)   2504   -4 (2/8, 25%)   -4 (2/8, 25%) vs 2643-rated opposition   -2.0 
    Breslau, 1912  2581 (#27 on January 1912 list)   2610   = (8.5/17, 50%)   -2 (3.5/9, 39%) vs 2694-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Scheveningen, 1913  2576 (#28 on July 1913 list)   2437   -1 (6/13, 46%)   -3 (1/5, 20%) vs 2566-rated opposition   -1.6 
    Mannheim, 1914  2521 (#44 on July 1914 list)   2452   -7 (2/11, 18%)   -6 (0.5/7, 7%) vs 2671-rated opposition   -1.8 
    Mieses-Tarrasch Match (Berlin), 1916  2477 (#43 on January 1916 list)   2579   -5 (4/13, 31%)   -5 (4/13, 31%) vs 2703-rated opposition   +0.9 
    John-Mieses Match (Leipzig), 1917  2505 (#21 on January 1917 list)   -   = (2/4, 50%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Berlin, 1918  2516 (#21 on January 1918 list)   [2563]   = (3/6, 50%)   -2 (1/4, 25%) vs 2709-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Kosice, 1918  2516 (#21 on January 1918 list)   [2456]   -4 (1.5/7, 21%)   -3 (0/3, 0%) vs 2644-rated opposition   -1.0 
    Berlin, 1920  2533 (#18 on January 1920 list)   2576   = (4.5/9, 50%)   -1 (2.5/6, 42%) vs 2646-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Gothenburg, 1920  2533 (#18 on January 1920 list)   2709   +2 (7.5/13, 58%)   +3 (6/9, 67%) vs 2652-rated opposition   +2.8 
    The Hague, 1921  2625 (#9 on January 1921 list)   2552   -3 (3/9, 33%)   -2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2656-rated opposition   -0.8 
    GER-SWE, 1922  2585 (#15 on January 1922 list)   [2549]   +1 (1.5/2, 75%)   +1 (1.5/2, 75%) vs 2538-rated opposition   +0.4 
    Teplitz-Schoenau, 1922  2585 (#15 on January 1922 list)   2579   -3 (5/13, 38%)   -2 (4.5/11, 41%) vs 2639-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Scheveningen, 1923  2572 (#17 on January 1923 list)   2473   +4 (7/10, 70%)   +1 (4/7, 57%) vs 2427-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Liverpool, 1923  2567 (#19 on March 1923 list)   2688   +7 (8/9, 89%)   +4 (4.5/5, 90%) vs 2572-rated opposition   +2.0 
    Hastings, 1923  2590 (#19 on December 1923 list)   2459   -3 (3/9, 33%)   -2 (3/8, 38%) vs 2516-rated opposition   -1.7 
    Berlin, 1924  2549 (#29 on January 1924 list)   2542   -2 (2/6, 33%)   -2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2643-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Baden-Baden, 1925  2537 (#32 on January 1925 list)   2520   -7 (6.5/20, 33%)   -6 (5/16, 31%) vs 2631-rated opposition   -1.2 
    Hannover, 1926  2487 (#50 on January 1926 list)   [2523]   -1 (3/7, 43%)   -1 (1.5/4, 38%) vs 2601-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Bad Kissingen, 1928  2479 (#78 on August 1928 list)   2543   -5 (3/11, 27%)   -5 (3/11, 27%) vs 2682-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Duisburg, 1929  2517 (#61 on July 1929 list)   2509   +1 (7/13, 54%)   -1 (4.5/10, 45%) vs 2532-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Frankfurt, 1930  2511 (#64 on January 1930 list)   2485   -3 (4/11, 36%)   -4 (3/10, 30%) vs 2593-rated opposition   -1.0 
    Swinemuende, 1931  2495 (#66 on January 1931 list)   2486   -1 (5.5/12, 46%)   -2 (3/8, 38%) vs 2550-rated opposition   -0.5 
    Nice, 1931  2495 (#66 on January 1931 list)   2533   = (4.5/9, 50%)   +1 (4.5/8, 56%) vs 2502-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Swinemunde, 1932  2481 (#82 on June 1932 list)   2567   +2 (5.5/9, 61%)   +1 (4/7, 57%) vs 2546-rated opposition   +1.0 
    Berlin-ch, 1933  2513 (#52 on January 1933 list)   2477   -1 (5/11, 45%)   -1 (4.5/10, 45%) vs 2493-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Margate, 1935  2493 (#90 on April 1935 list)   2425   -4 (2.5/9, 28%)   -3 (1.5/6, 25%) vs 2534-rated opposition   -1.2 
    Bournemouth, 1939  not rated on August 1939 list   2472   -4 (3.5/11, 32%)   -2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2552-rated opposition   N/A 
    Hastings 4546, 1945  not rated on December 1945 list   [2441]   -5 (3/11, 27%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2541-rated opposition   N/A