1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Frank Marshall
   Born:    1877-Aug
   Died:    1944-Nov
   Best World Rank:    #2 (on the August 1913 rating list)
   Highest Rating:    2762 on the December 1917 rating list, #3 in world, age 40y4m
   Best Individual Performance:    2807 in Janowsky-Marshall II (Paris), 1905, scoring 10/17 (59%) vs 2770-rated opposition
  Graph   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
    Event Name  Rating   Performance   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   +/- Predicted 
    Napier-Marshall Match (New York), 1896  not rated on January 1896 list   -   -6 (2.5/11, 23%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Marshall-Jasnogrodsky Match (New York), 1898  not rated on January 1898 list   -   = (3.5/7, 50%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Lipschütz-Marshall I (Grove Springs), 1898  not rated on January 1898 list   [2403]   -3 (0/3, 0%)   -3 (0/3, 0%) vs 2568-rated opposition   N/A 
    Grove Spring, 1898  2392 (#83 on August 1898 list)   2466   -4 (1.5/7, 21%)   -2 (1.5/5, 30%) vs 2559-rated opposition   =0.0 
    London, 1899  2376 (#104 on January 1899 list)   [2556]   +6 (8.5/11, 77%)   +1 (2/3, 67%) vs 2544-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Saratoga Springs, 1899  2376 (#104 on January 1899 list)   2592   +2 (4.5/7, 64%)   +2 (4.5/7, 64%) vs 2540-rated opposition   +2.4 
    Janowsky-Marshall I (New York), 1899  2376 (#104 on January 1899 list)   [2593]   -2 (1/4, 25%)   -2 (1/4, 25%) vs 2749-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Johnston-Marshall Match (Chicago), 1899  2376 (#104 on January 1899 list)   -   +1 (8/15, 53%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Lipschütz-Marshall II (Saratoga), 1899  2376 (#104 on January 1899 list)   [2445]   -3 (0/3, 0%)   -3 (0/3, 0%) vs 2628-rated opposition   -0.6 
    New York, 1900  2472 (#54 on January 1900 list)   2484   -5 (2.5/10, 25%)   -3 (1.5/6, 25%) vs 2611-rated opposition   -0.5 
    Delmar-Marshall Match (New York), 1900  2472 (#54 on January 1900 list)   2583   +3 (4/5, 80%)   +3 (4/5, 80%) vs 2478-rated opposition   +1.5 
    Marshall-Roething Match (New York), 1900  2472 (#54 on January 1900 list)   -   +3 (5/7, 71%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Paris, 1900  2489 (#52 on May 1900 list)   2757   +8 (13.5/19, 71%)   +4 (9.5/15, 63%) vs 2690-rated opposition   +5.6 
    Buffalo, 1901  2605 (#17 on January 1901 list)   [2467]   -5 (2.5/10, 25%)   -3 (0.5/4, 13%) vs 2630-rated opposition   -1.4 
    Monte Carlo, 1901  2605 (#17 on January 1901 list)   2608   -3 (8.5/20, 43%)   -2 (7/16, 44%) vs 2647-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Hannover, 1902  2582 (#24 on January 1902 list)   2604   -1 (8/17, 47%)   = (6/12, 50%) vs 2609-rated opposition   +0.4 
    ENG-USA cable m, 1902  2582 (#24 on January 1902 list)   -   -1 (0/1, 0%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Marshall-Ward Match (London), 1902  2582 (#24 on January 1902 list)   -   +2 (4/6, 67%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Marshall-Teichmann Match (London), 1902  2582 (#24 on January 1902 list)   2645   +2 (3.5/5, 70%)   +2 (3.5/5, 70%) vs 2609-rated opposition   +1.2 
    Monte Carlo, 1902  2582 (#24 on January 1902 list)   2662   +3 (12/21, 57%)   +2 (9.5/17, 56%) vs 2624-rated opposition   +1.8 
    Loman-Marshall Match (London), 1902  2600 (#23 on April 1902 list)   -   +2 (4/6, 67%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    ENG-USA cable m, 1903  2616 (#17 on January 1903 list)   [2648]   +1 (1/1, 100%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2702-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Monte Carlo, 1903  2616 (#17 on January 1903 list)   2569   -2 (12/26, 46%)   -6 (8/22, 36%) vs 2650-rated opposition   -2.1 
    Manhattan CC-Franklin CC Cable Match, 1904  2652 (#12 on January 1904 list)   [2585]   -1 (0/1, 0%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2771-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Monte Carlo, 1904  2652 (#12 on January 1904 list)   2714   +3 (6.5/10, 65%)   +3 (6.5/10, 65%) vs 2660-rated opposition   +1.6 
    Monte Carlo, 1904  2652 (#12 on January 1904 list)   2597   +2 (6/10, 60%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2617-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Sylvan Beach, 1904  2652 (#12 on January 1904 list)   -   +6 (6/6, 100%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    USA-07.Congress St Louis, 1904  2652 (#12 on January 1904 list)   [2504]   +8 (9.5/11, 86%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2473-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Cambridge Springs, 1904  2658 (#11 on April 1904 list)   2803   +11 (13/15, 87%)   +5 (7/9, 78%) vs 2702-rated opposition   +3.0 
    Barmen, 1905  2715 (#8 on January 1905 list)   2709   +5 (10/15, 67%)   +4 (8.5/13, 65%) vs 2630-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Marshall-Napier Match (London), 1905  2715 (#8 on January 1905 list)   2541   -2 (1.5/5, 30%)   -2 (1.5/5, 30%) vs 2658-rated opposition   -1.3 
    Marshall-Tarrasch Match (Nuremberg), 1905  2715 (#8 on January 1905 list)   2607   -7 (5/17, 29%)   -7 (5/17, 29%) vs 2744-rated opposition   -2.9 
    Ostend, 1905  2715 (#8 on January 1905 list)   2652   -1 (12.5/26, 48%)   -2 (10/22, 45%) vs 2677-rated opposition   -2.0 
    Ostende2, 1905  2715 (#8 on January 1905 list)   [2581]   = (1.5/3, 50%)   = (1.5/3, 50%) vs 2640-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Janowsky-Marshall II (Paris), 1905  2715 (#8 on January 1905 list)   2807   +3 (10/17, 59%)   +3 (10/17, 59%) vs 2770-rated opposition   +2.6 
    Scheveningen, 1905  2715 (#8 on January 1905 list)   [2583]   +8 (10.5/13, 81%)   +2 (3/4, 75%) vs 2524-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Nuremberg, 1906  2726 (#5 on January 1906 list)   2752   +9 (12.5/16, 78%)   +7 (10/13, 77%) vs 2606-rated opposition   +1.7 
    Fox-Marshall Match (New York), 1906  2726 (#5 on January 1906 list)   [2664]   +3 (3.5/4, 88%)   +3 (3.5/4, 88%) vs 2582-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Ostend, 1906  2726 (#5 on January 1906 list)   2601   -1 (4/9, 44%)   -1 (4/9, 44%) vs 2651-rated opposition   -1.3 
    ENG-USA cable m corr, 1907  2738 (#4 on January 1907 list)   [2568]   = (0.5/1, 50%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2660-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Ostend, 1907  2738 (#4 on January 1907 list)   2743   +3 (11.5/20, 58%)   +3 (11.5/20, 58%) vs 2697-rated opposition   +0.5 
    Lasker-Marshall I (World Championship, USA), 1907  2738 (#4 on January 1907 list)   2508   -8 (3.5/15, 23%)   -8 (3.5/15, 23%) vs 2671-rated opposition   -5.2 
    Karlsbad, 1907  2715 (#6 on August 1907 list)   2600   = (10/20, 50%)   -2 (8/18, 44%) vs 2630-rated opposition   -2.8 
    Marshall-Mieses Match (Berlin), 1908  2694 (#8 on January 1908 list)   2660   +1 (5.5/10, 55%)   +1 (5.5/10, 55%) vs 2655-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Lodz, 1908  2694 (#8 on January 1908 list)   2688   = (8/16, 50%)   = (8/16, 50%) vs 2697-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Prague, 1908  2694 (#8 on January 1908 list)   2637   +3 (11/19, 58%)   = (7.5/15, 50%) vs 2640-rated opposition   -0.9 
    Janowsky-Marshall III (Suresne), 1908  2694 (#8 on January 1908 list)   2555   -3 (3.5/10, 35%)   -3 (3.5/10, 35%) vs 2648-rated opposition   -2.0 
    Vienna, 1908  2694 (#8 on January 1908 list)   2610   +1 (10/19, 53%)   -1 (8/17, 47%) vs 2625-rated opposition   -1.9 
    Marshall-Rubinstein Match (Warsaw), 1908  2694 (#8 on January 1908 list)   2690   -1 (3.5/8, 44%)   -1 (3.5/8, 44%) vs 2769-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Duesseldorf, 1908  2676 (#10 on August 1908 list)   2685   +8 (11.5/15, 77%)   +5 (7.5/10, 75%) vs 2563-rated opposition   +1.2 
    Bath Beach, 1909  2681 (#9 on January 1909 list)   -   +2 (3.5/5, 70%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    ENG-USA cable m corr, 1909  2681 (#9 on January 1909 list)   [2568]   +1 (1/1, 100%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2575-rated opposition   +0.4 
    Jaffe-Marshall Match (New York), 1909  2681 (#9 on January 1909 list)   -   +2 (5.5/9, 61%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Marshall-Showalter Match (USA), 1909  2681 (#9 on January 1909 list)   -   +5 (8.5/12, 71%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Brooklyn CC-Rice CC New York, 1909  2683 (#9 on March 1909 list)   -   = (0.5/1, 50%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Capablanca-Marshall Match (New York), 1909  2684 (#9 on April 1909 list)   -   -7 (8/23, 35%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Hamburg, 1910  2686 (#10 on January 1910 list)   2682   +4 (10.5/17, 62%)   +2 (7/12, 58%) vs 2650-rated opposition   +0.5 
    ENG-USA cable m, 1910  2686 (#10 on January 1910 list)   [2555]   +1 (1/1, 100%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2554-rated opposition   +0.3 
    New York, 1910  2686 (#10 on January 1910 list)   [2579]   -1 (0/1, 0%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2763-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Manhattan CC-Franklin CC New York, 1910  2686 (#9 on May 1910 list)   -   = (0.5/1, 50%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Capablanca-Marshall Training Match (New York), 1910  2691 (#9 on October 1910 list)   [2760]   +2 (2.5/3, 83%)   +2 (2.5/3, 83%) vs 2774-rated opposition   +1.3 
    ENG-USA cable m, 1911  2701 (#8 on January 1911 list)   [2458]   -1 (0/1, 0%)   -1 (0/1, 0%) vs 2569-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Leonhardt-Marshall Match (Hamburg), 1911  2701 (#8 on January 1911 list)   2633   +1 (4/7, 57%)   +1 (4/7, 57%) vs 2631-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Karlsbad, 1911  2701 (#8 on January 1911 list)   2732   +6 (15.5/25, 62%)   +4 (10/16, 63%) vs 2662-rated opposition   +1.3 
    New York, 1911  2701 (#8 on January 1911 list)   [2634]   +8 (10/12, 83%)   +1 (1.5/2, 75%) vs 2666-rated opposition   +0.4 
    San Sebastian, 1911  2703 (#8 on February 1911 list)   2740   +3 (8.5/14, 61%)   +3 (8/13, 62%) vs 2693-rated opposition   +1.3 
    Bad Pistyan, 1912  2711 (#8 on January 1912 list)   2673   +4 (10.5/17, 62%)   +2 (6.5/11, 59%) vs 2639-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Janowsky-Marshall IV (Biarritz), 1912  2711 (#8 on January 1912 list)   2731   +5 (7/9, 78%)   +5 (7/9, 78%) vs 2614-rated opposition   +1.5 
    Budapest, 1912  2711 (#8 on January 1912 list)   2685   +1 (3/5, 60%)   +1 (3/5, 60%) vs 2708-rated opposition   +0.5 
    Breslau, 1912  2711 (#8 on January 1912 list)   2572   +2 (9.5/17, 56%)   -3 (3/9, 33%) vs 2679-rated opposition   -1.8 
    San Sebastian, 1912  2711 (#8 on January 1912 list)   2690   = (9.5/19, 50%)   = (9.5/19, 50%) vs 2693-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Duras-Marshall Match (New York), 1913  2718 (#6 on January 1913 list)   [2740]   +3 (3/3, 100%)   +3 (3/3, 100%) vs 2685-rated opposition   +1.4 
    New York, 1913  2718 (#6 on January 1913 list)   2681   +4 (5/6, 83%)   +4 (5/6, 83%) vs 2570-rated opposition   +1.0 
    Philadelphia-Manhattan USA, 1913  2718 (#6 on January 1913 list)   -   +1 (1/1, 100%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    New York National, 1913  2718 (#6 on January 1913 list)   [2579]   +8 (10.5/13, 81%)   +1 (2.5/4, 63%) vs 2571-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Havana, 1913  2724 (#4 on February 1913 list)   2648   +7 (10.5/14, 75%)   +4 (7/10, 70%) vs 2549-rated opposition   -0.1 
    American Chess Bulletin USA, 1914  2753 (#3 on January 1914 list)   -   -8 (5/18, 28%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    St. Petersburg, 1914  2754 (#3 on April 1914 list)   2655   -2 (8/18, 44%)   -3 (6.5/16, 41%) vs 2723-rated opposition   -2.1 
    Mannheim, 1914  2744 (#5 on July 1914 list)   2654   +3 (7/11, 64%)   +2 (5.5/9, 61%) vs 2617-rated opposition   -0.3 
    New York, 1915  2739 (#5 on April 1915 list)   2685   +10 (12/14, 86%)   +4 (6/8, 75%) vs 2585-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Janowsky-Marshall V (New York), 1916  2752 (#5 on January 1916 list)   2707   +3 (5.5/8, 69%)   +3 (5.5/8, 69%) vs 2649-rated opposition   +0.5 
    New York, 1918  2761 (#3 on November 1918 list)   [2631]   +2 (7/12, 58%)   +1 (2.5/4, 63%) vs 2643-rated opposition   -0.1 
    New York Metropolitan tt, 1922  not rated on January 1922 list   -   +1 (2.5/4, 63%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    New York Metropolitan tt, 1923  not rated on January 1923 list   -   = (1/2, 50%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    USA, 1923  not rated on January 1923 list   -   = (0.5/1, 50%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Lasker-Marshall II (USA), 1923  not rated on January 1923 list   -   +1 (9.5/18, 53%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    New York Dimock, 1924  2557 (#26 on January 1924 list)   -   +8 (9/10, 90%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    New York, 1924  2551 (#26 on March 1924 list)   2677   +2 (11/20, 55%)   = (9/18, 50%) vs 2679-rated opposition   +2.7 
    Baden-Baden, 1925  2659 (#11 on January 1925 list)   2680   +5 (12.5/20, 63%)   +3 (9.5/16, 59%) vs 2624-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Marienbad, 1925  2659 (#11 on January 1925 list)   2694   +5 (10/15, 67%)   +4 (8.5/13, 65%) vs 2613-rated opposition   +1.3 
    New York Metropolitan tt, 1925  2659 (#11 on January 1925 list)   [2486]   -1 (0.5/2, 25%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2529-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Moscow, 1925  2682 (#7 on November 1925 list)   2683   +5 (12.5/20, 63%)   +2 (8/14, 57%) vs 2650-rated opposition   +0.5 
    Chicago, 1926  2692 (#6 on January 1926 list)   [2610]   +1 (2/3, 67%)   +1 (2/3, 67%) vs 2620-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Lake Hopatcong, 1926  2695 (#6 on July 1926 list)   2536   -2 (3/8, 38%)   -2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2636-rated opposition   -1.4 
    New York, 1927  2680 (#7 on February 1927 list)   2587   -8 (6/20, 30%)   -8 (6/20, 30%) vs 2716-rated opposition   -3.2 
    London, 1927  2655 (#12 on October 1927 list)   2718   +4 (7.5/11, 68%)   +4 (6.5/9, 72%) vs 2630-rated opposition   +1.7 
    Hastings 2829, 1928  2674 (#11 on January 1928 list)   2582   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +3 (6/9, 67%) vs 2496-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Bad Kissingen, 1928  2674 (#9 on August 1928 list)   2623   -1 (5/11, 45%)   -1 (5/11, 45%) vs 2664-rated opposition   -0.6 
    Brno, 1928  2668 (#9 on September 1928 list)   2564   +1 (5/9, 56%)   +1 (5/9, 56%) vs 2539-rated opposition   -0.9 
    Budapest, 1928  2668 (#9 on September 1928 list)   2608   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +1 (4/7, 57%) vs 2598-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Berlin, 1928  2662 (#9 on October 1928 list)   2619   -3 (4.5/12, 38%)   -3 (4.5/12, 38%) vs 2708-rated opposition   -0.9 
    Bradley Beach, 1929  2656 (#11 on January 1929 list)   [2579]   = (4.5/9, 50%)   = (2/4, 50%) vs 2624-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Karlsbad, 1929  2654 (#11 on July 1929 list)   2587   -3 (9/21, 43%)   -4 (8/20, 40%) vs 2646-rated opposition   -2.2 
    Liege, 1930  2629 (#13 on January 1930 list)   2596   -1 (4.5/10, 45%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2616-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Hamburg ol (Men), 1930  2619 (#14 on July 1930 list)   2566   +1 (5/9, 56%)   +1 (4/7, 57%) vs 2545-rated opposition   -0.1 
    New York, 1931  2596 (#23 on April 1931 list)   [2518]   -3 (4/11, 36%)   -2 (0.5/3, 17%) vs 2671-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Prague ol (Men), 1931  2553 (#44 on July 1931 list)   2597   +1 (4/7, 57%)   +1 (3/5, 60%) vs 2591-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Folkestone ol (Men), 1933  2541 (#41 on June 1933 list)   2623   +4 (7/10, 70%)   +3 (4.5/6, 75%) vs 2536-rated opposition   +1.5 
    Warsaw ol (Men), 1935  not rated on August 1935 list   [2530]   = (3.5/7, 50%)   -1 (1.5/4, 38%) vs 2610-rated opposition   N/A 
    Stockholm ol (Men), 1937  not rated on July 1937 list   [2475]   +3 (3/3, 100%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2426-rated opposition   N/A 
    New York, 1938  not rated on January 1938 list   -   +1 (1/1, 100%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Lasker-Marshall III (New York), 1940  not rated on May 1940 list   -   +1 (1.5/2, 75%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    New York, 1941  not rated on January 1941 list   [2419]   +1 (4/7, 57%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2469-rated opposition   N/A