|
Event Name |
Rating |
Performance |
Overall Results |
Actual Results vs Rated Opponents |
+/- Predicted |
|
MacKenzie-MacDonnell I, 1862 |
not rated on January 1862 list |
- |
-3 (5/13, 38%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
London Handicap, 1862 |
not rated on June 1862 list |
- |
+6 (9/12, 75%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
MacDonnell-MacKenzie II (Dublin), 1862 |
2489 (#13 on December 1862 list) |
2627 |
+3 (6.5/10, 65%) |
+3 (6.5/10, 65%) vs 2554-rated opposition |
+2.3 |
|
Mackenzie-Reichhelm I (New York), 1866 |
not rated on March 1866 list |
- |
+5 (5.5/6, 92%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
Mackenzie-Reichhelm II (Philadelphia), 1867 |
not rated on May 1867 list |
- |
+7 (8/9, 89%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
|
Mackenzie-Stanley Match, 1868 |
not rated on January 1868 list |
- |
+1 (2/3, 67%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
USA-02. Kongress (Cleveland), 1871 |
not rated on December 1871 list |
- |
+12 (15.5/19, 82%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
3rd American Chess Congress (Chicago), 1874 |
not rated on July 1874 list |
- |
+9 (10.5/12, 88%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
Paris, 1878 |
not rated on June 1878 list |
2648 |
+6 (15/24, 63%) |
+2 (7/12, 58%) vs 2609-rated opposition |
N/A |
|
New York, 1880 |
2637 (#5 on January 1880 list) |
- |
+11 (15.5/20, 78%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
|
Judd-Mackenzie Match (New York), 1881 |
2651 (#6 on January 1881 list) |
- |
+2 (7.5/13, 58%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
Vienna, 1882 |
2643 (#5 on May 1882 list) |
2689 |
+9 (20.5/32, 64%) |
+4 (13.5/23, 59%) vs 2621-rated opposition |
+1.4 |
|
Blackburne-Mackenzie I (London), 1882 |
2706 (#3 on September 1882 list) |
[2669] |
+1 (2/3, 67%) |
+1 (2/3, 67%) vs 2704-rated opposition |
+0.5 |
|
Mackenzie-Mason Match (London), 1882 |
2712 (#3 on October 1882 list) |
[2570] |
-1 (1/3, 33%) |
-1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2685-rated opposition |
-0.6 |
|
New York, 1883 |
2701 (#5 on January 1883 list) |
- |
+5 (10.5/16, 66%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
|
Mackenzie-Steinitz Match (New York), 1883 |
2701 (#5 on February 1883 list) |
2647 |
-2 (2/6, 33%) |
-2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2780-rated opposition |
-0.4 |
|
London, 1883 |
2702 (#5 on April 1883 list) |
2673 |
+5 (23/41, 56%) |
+1 (18.5/36, 51%) vs 2644-rated opposition |
-1.9 |
|
New York, 1885 |
2680 (#6 on January 1885 list) |
- |
+2 (11/20, 55%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
Hamburg, 1885 |
2642 (#9 on July 1885 list) |
2602 |
+3 (10/17, 59%) |
+1 (7/13, 54%) vs 2579-rated opposition |
-0.5 |
|
Hereford, 1885 |
2636 (#9 on August 1885 list) |
2612 |
+4 (7/10, 70%) |
+2 (5/8, 63%) vs 2566-rated opposition |
+0.3 |
|
|
New York, 1886 |
2632 (#12 on January 1886 list) |
2578 |
+9 (16.5/24, 69%) |
+3 (7.5/12, 63%) vs 2500-rated opposition |
-0.4 |
|
Burn-Mackenzie Match (London), 1886 |
2632 (#12 on January 1886 list) |
- |
= (5/10, 50%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
Lipschütz-Mackenzie Match (New York), 1886 |
2632 (#12 on January 1886 list) |
- |
+2 (7.5/13, 58%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
London, 1886 |
2624 (#12 on July 1886 list) |
2593 |
= (6/12, 50%) |
= (6/12, 50%) vs 2597-rated opposition |
-0.4 |
|
Golmayo-Mackenzie I (Havana), 1887 |
2624 (#11 on January 1887 list) |
- |
+3 (6/9, 67%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
|
Golmayo-Mackenzie II (Havana), 1887 |
2624 (#11 on January 1887 list) |
- |
+5 (5.5/6, 92%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
Mackenzie-Vasquez Match (Havana), 1887 |
2624 (#11 on January 1887 list) |
- |
+4 (6.5/9, 72%) |
no games vs rated opposition |
N/A |
|
Frankfurt, 1887 |
2642 (#7 on July 1887 list) |
2725 |
+10 (15/20, 75%) |
+5 (8.5/12, 71%) vs 2621-rated opposition |
+2.2 |
|
Golmayo-Mackenzie III (Havana), 1888 |
2680 (#5 on January 1888 list) |
2622 |
+3 (7.5/12, 63%) |
+3 (7.5/12, 63%) vs 2551-rated opposition |
-0.3 |
|
Blackburne-Mackenzie II (London), 1888 |
2680 (#5 on January 1888 list) |
[2562] |
-2 (0.5/3, 17%) |
-2 (0.5/3, 17%) vs 2734-rated opposition |
-0.8 |
|
|
Glasgow, 1888 |
2682 (#5 on July 1888 list) |
[2429] |
+4 (5/6, 83%) |
= (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2438-rated opposition |
-0.3 |
|
Bradford, 1888 |
2676 (#6 on August 1888 list) |
2692 |
+8 (12/16, 75%) |
+5 (9/13, 69%) vs 2586-rated opposition |
+1.1 |
|
Manchester, 1890 |
2664 (#10 on August 1890 list) |
2638 |
+5 (12/19, 63%) |
+4 (10/16, 63%) vs 2554-rated opposition |
-0.1 |