1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Edgar Colle
   Born:    1897-May
   Died:    1932-Apr
   Best World Rank:    #14 (on the November 1930 rating list)
   Highest Rating:    2619 on the December 1930 rating list, #15 in world, age 33y7m
   Best Individual Performance:    2689 in Scarborough, 1930, scoring 7.5/10 (75%) vs 2568-rated opposition
  (no graph available)   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
    Event Name  Rating   Performance   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   +/- Predicted 
    Scheveningen, 1923  not rated on January 1923 list   2595   +6 (8/10, 80%)   +5 (6/7, 86%) vs 2427-rated opposition   N/A 
    Hastings, 1923  2536 (#30 on December 1923 list)   2578   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +2 (5/8, 63%) vs 2523-rated opposition   +0.9 
    Meran, 1924  2595 (#20 on January 1924 list)   2546   = (6.5/13, 50%)   = (5.5/11, 50%) vs 2543-rated opposition   -0.7 
    Paris f-A, 1924  2595 (#20 on January 1924 list)   [2525]   +2 (3.5/5, 70%)   = (1/2, 50%) vs 2573-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Paris prel-4, 1924  2595 (#20 on January 1924 list)   [2511]   +3 (3/3, 100%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2484-rated opposition   +0.4 
    Colle-Euwe I (Zutphen), 1924  2595 (#20 on January 1924 list)   2532   -2 (3/8, 38%)   -2 (3/8, 38%) vs 2608-rated opposition   -0.9 
    Hastings, 1924  2576 (#24 on December 1924 list)   2375   -2 (2.5/7, 36%)   -3 (1.5/6, 25%) vs 2469-rated opposition   -2.3 
    Baden-Baden, 1925  2539 (#31 on January 1925 list)   2520   -6 (7/20, 35%)   -6 (5/16, 31%) vs 2631-rated opposition   -1.3 
    Colle-Koltanowski Match (BEL), 1925  2539 (#31 on January 1925 list)   2599   +4 (5.5/7, 79%)   +4 (5.5/7, 79%) vs 2472-rated opposition   +1.4 
    NED-BEL m The Hague, 1925  2539 (#31 on January 1925 list)   [2505]   +1 (1/1, 100%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2474-rated opposition   +0.4 
    Paris, 1925  2539 (#31 on January 1925 list)   2425   -6 (1/8, 13%)   -6 (1/8, 13%) vs 2615-rated opposition   -2.3 
    Hastings, 1925  2539 (#31 on January 1925 list)   2527   -1 (4/9, 44%)   = (4/8, 50%) vs 2531-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Berlin, 1926  2505 (#43 on January 1926 list)   2545   -1 (4/9, 44%)   -2 (2/6, 33%) vs 2647-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Ghent, 1926  2505 (#43 on January 1926 list)   2519   -1 (4.5/10, 45%)   -1 (3.5/8, 44%) vs 2555-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Meran, 1926  2505 (#43 on January 1926 list)   2594   +5 (9/13, 69%)   +1 (3.5/6, 58%) vs 2583-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Scarborough-2nd playoff, 1926  2505 (#43 on January 1926 list)   [2556]   -2 (0/2, 0%)   -2 (0/2, 0%) vs 2761-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Scarborough-B, 1926  2505 (#43 on January 1926 list)   [2498]   +2 (4/6, 67%)   +1 (2/3, 67%) vs 2460-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Weston, 1926  2505 (#43 on January 1926 list)   2558   +4 (6.5/9, 72%)   +4 (5.5/7, 79%) vs 2419-rated opposition   +1.3 
    Amsterdam ASC, 1926  2519 (#39 on April 1926 list)   [2630]   +2 (2.5/3, 83%)   +1 (1.5/2, 75%) vs 2659-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Budapest, 1926  2535 (#38 on June 1926 list)   2579   +1 (8/15, 53%)   +1 (7/13, 54%) vs 2553-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Bardejov, 1926  2563 (#26 on July 1926 list)   2526   +3 (7.5/12, 63%)   +1 (5.5/10, 55%) vs 2492-rated opposition   -0.3 
    Hastings, 1926  2553 (#35 on December 1926 list)   2588   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +2 (4/6, 67%) vs 2533-rated opposition   +0.9 
    Bad Niendorf, 1927  2568 (#32 on January 1927 list)   2605   +1 (4/7, 57%)   +1 (3.5/6, 58%) vs 2598-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Kecskemet, 1927  2568 (#32 on January 1927 list)   2534   +1 (5/9, 56%)   -1 (3/7, 43%) vs 2582-rated opposition   -0.4 
    Kecskemet-S2, 1927  2568 (#32 on January 1927 list)   [2484]   -5 (1/7, 14%)   -2 (1/4, 25%) vs 2600-rated opposition   -0.8 
    Scarborough, 1927  2568 (#32 on January 1927 list)   2592   +4 (6.5/9, 72%)   +2 (3.5/5, 70%) vs 2537-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Tunbridge Wells, 1927  2568 (#32 on January 1927 list)   2540   +1 (4/7, 57%)   +1 (4/7, 57%) vs 2512-rated opposition   =0.0 
    London, 1927  2569 (#26 on October 1927 list)   2539   -2 (4.5/11, 41%)   -3 (3/9, 33%) vs 2640-rated opposition   -0.8 
    Hastings, 1927  2567 (#28 on December 1927 list)   2580   +2 (5.5/9, 61%)   +2 (5.5/9, 61%) vs 2526-rated opposition   +0.6 
    Colle-Euwe II (Amsterdam), 1928  2575 (#26 on January 1928 list)   2468   -5 (0.5/6, 8%)   -5 (0.5/6, 8%) vs 2676-rated opposition   -1.8 
    Colle-Van Hoorn Match (Amsterdam), 1928  2575 (#26 on January 1928 list)   -   +3 (4/5, 80%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Scarborough, 1928  2575 (#26 on January 1928 list)   2501   +3 (6/9, 67%)   = (3/6, 50%) vs 2505-rated opposition   -0.5 
    Hastings 2829, 1928  2575 (#26 on January 1928 list)   2591   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +3 (6/9, 67%) vs 2507-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Dortmund, 1928  2580 (#28 on July 1928 list)   2485   -2 (3/8, 38%)   -3 (1.5/6, 25%) vs 2613-rated opposition   -1.3 
    Colle-Euwe III (Amsterdam), 1928  2562 (#37 on December 1928 list)   [2604]   -1 (1/3, 33%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2734-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Paris, 1929  2562 (#35 on January 1929 list)   [2541]   +3 (6/9, 67%)   +2 (3/4, 75%) vs 2466-rated opposition   +0.5 
    Karlsbad, 1929  2571 (#30 on July 1929 list)   2622   -1 (10/21, 48%)   -2 (9/20, 45%) vs 2650-rated opposition   +0.8 
    Barcelona, 1929  2580 (#25 on September 1929 list)   2577   +8 (11/14, 79%)   +2 (5/8, 63%) vs 2522-rated opposition   +0.5 
    Budapest, 1929  2580 (#25 on September 1929 list)   2590   = (6.5/13, 50%)   = (6.5/13, 50%) vs 2590-rated opposition   +0.2 
    Frankfurt, 1930  2590 (#22 on January 1930 list)   2603   +2 (6.5/11, 59%)   +1 (5.5/10, 55%) vs 2585-rated opposition   +0.5 
    Liege, 1930  2590 (#22 on January 1930 list)   2651   +1 (6/11, 55%)   +2 (5.5/9, 61%) vs 2614-rated opposition   +1.3 
    Nice, 1930  2590 (#22 on January 1930 list)   2560   +2 (6.5/11, 59%)   +1 (4.5/8, 56%) vs 2536-rated opposition   =0.0 
    San Remo, 1930  2590 (#22 on January 1930 list)   2596   -2 (6.5/15, 43%)   -2 (6/14, 43%) vs 2642-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Scarborough, 1930  2590 (#22 on January 1930 list)   2689   +6 (8.5/11, 77%)   +5 (7.5/10, 75%) vs 2568-rated opposition   +2.2 
    Hastings, 1930  2619 (#15 on December 1930 list)   2459   -4 (2.5/9, 28%)   -4 (2/8, 25%) vs 2587-rated opposition   -2.3 
    Bled, 1931  2600 (#21 on January 1931 list)   2617   -5 (10.5/26, 40%)   -4 (10/24, 42%) vs 2665-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Rotterdam, 1931  2600 (#21 on January 1931 list)   2631   +1 (3.5/6, 58%)   +1 (3.5/6, 58%) vs 2632-rated opposition   +0.7