1-year peak   2-year peak   3-year peak   4-year peak   5-year peak   10-year peak   15-year peak   20-year peak    Find a player
Chessmetrics Player Profile: Amos Burn
   Born:    1848-Dec
   Died:    1925-Nov
   Best World Rank:    #2 (on the September 1876 rating list)
   Highest Rating:    2728 on the October 1900 rating list, #6 in world, age 51y10m
   Best Individual Performance:    2750 in Cologne, 1898, scoring 9/12 (75%) vs 2624-rated opposition
  Graph   Best Performances   Career Details   Event Details   Ratings only
    Event Name  Rating   Performance   Overall Results   Actual Results vs Rated Opponents   +/- Predicted 
    London, 1870  not rated on October 1870 list   [2627]   +3 (5.5/8, 69%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2669-rated opposition   N/A 
    Bristol, 1873  not rated on January 1873 list   -   +7 (8/9, 89%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Birmingham, 1874  not rated on January 1874 list   -   +9 (9/9, 100%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Burn-Owen Match (Liverpool), 1874  not rated on September 1874 list   -   +5 (12.5/20, 63%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Glasgow, 1875  2554 (#10 on August 1875 list)   -   +7 (9/11, 82%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Cheltenham, 1876  2545 (#11 on July 1876 list)   [2554]   +10 (11/12, 92%)   +3 (3/3, 100%) vs 2419-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Birmingham, Section B, 1883  not rated on January 1883 list   -   +4 (5.5/7, 79%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Burn-Mackenzie Match (London), 1886  not rated on January 1886 list   2617   = (5/10, 50%)   = (5/10, 50%) vs 2632-rated opposition   N/A 
    Bird-Burn Match (London), 1886  not rated on January 1886 list   2606   = (9/18, 50%)   = (9/18, 50%) vs 2599-rated opposition   N/A 
    London, 1886  2588 (#16 on July 1886 list)   2681   +4 (9/14, 64%)   +4 (9/14, 64%) vs 2600-rated opposition   +2.2 
    Nottingham, 1886  2648 (#8 on August 1886 list)   2737   +7 (8/9, 89%)   +6 (7/8, 88%) vs 2580-rated opposition   +2.4 
    Belfast, 1886  2689 (#4 on September 1886 list)   [2447]   +4 (6/8, 75%)   -1 (1/3, 33%) vs 2510-rated opposition   -1.1 
    Frankfurt, 1887  2670 (#4 on July 1887 list)   2522   -1 (9.5/20, 48%)   -4 (4/12, 33%) vs 2619-rated opposition   -2.7 
    London, 1887  2641 (#9 on November 1887 list)   2714   +7 (10.5/14, 75%)   +6 (9.5/13, 73%) vs 2586-rated opposition   +2.2 
    Burn-Owen Match (Liverpool), 1888  2677 (#6 on January 1888 list)   -   -2 (3/8, 38%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Bradford, 1888  2664 (#7 on August 1888 list)   2629   +5 (10.5/16, 66%)   +2 (7.5/13, 58%) vs 2587-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Dublin, 1889  2651 (#8 on March 1889 list)   [2569]   +7 (7.5/8, 94%)   +1 (1.5/2, 75%) vs 2568-rated opposition   +0.3 
    New York, 1889  2651 (#8 on March 1889 list)   2656   +14 (28/42, 67%)   +4 (16.5/29, 57%) vs 2590-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Breslau, 1889  2683 (#6 on July 1889 list)   2700   +6 (11.5/17, 68%)   +6 (11/16, 69%) vs 2583-rated opposition   +1.1 
    Amsterdam, 1889  2680 (#6 on August 1889 list)   [2679]   +6 (7/8, 88%)   +2 (2.5/3, 83%) vs 2659-rated opposition   +0.9 
    Hastings, 1895  not rated on August 1895 list   2612   -2 (9.5/21, 45%)   -3 (7.5/18, 42%) vs 2664-rated opposition   N/A 
    Craigside, 1897  2588 (#26 on January 1897 list)   [2506]   +5 (6.5/8, 81%)   +1 (2.5/4, 63%) vs 2471-rated opposition   -0.1 
    Berlin, 1897  2615 (#25 on September 1897 list)   2696   +3 (10/17, 59%)   +4 (9.5/15, 63%) vs 2619-rated opposition   +2.1 
    Craigside, 1898  2656 (#15 on January 1898 list)   [2576]   +8 (9/10, 90%)   +2 (3/4, 75%) vs 2514-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Vienna, 1898  2669 (#14 on May 1898 list)   2700   +4 (20/36, 56%)   +2 (18/34, 53%) vs 2663-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Cologne, 1898  2687 (#11 on July 1898 list)   2750   +8 (11.5/15, 77%)   +6 (9/12, 75%) vs 2624-rated opposition   +2.1 
    Birmingham, 1899  2715 (#8 on January 1899 list)   2608   +4 (5/6, 83%)   +3 (4/5, 80%) vs 2511-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Craigside, 1899  2715 (#8 on January 1899 list)   2648   +8 (9/10, 90%)   +6 (7/8, 88%) vs 2469-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Bellingham-Burn Match (Liverpool), 1900  2714 (#8 on January 1900 list)   -   = (4.5/9, 50%)   no games vs rated opposition   N/A 
    Paris, 1900  2713 (#8 on May 1900 list)   2702   +6 (12.5/19, 66%)   +2 (8.5/15, 57%) vs 2671-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Munich, 1900  2720 (#8 on July 1900 list)   2694   +6 (10.5/15, 70%)   +3 (7.5/12, 63%) vs 2637-rated opposition   +0.3 
    Llandudno, 1901  2722 (#6 on January 1901 list)   [2519]   = (0.5/1, 50%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2581-rated opposition   -0.2 
    Barmen, 1905  not rated on January 1905 list   2571   -3 (6/15, 40%)   -3 (5.5/14, 39%) vs 2636-rated opposition   N/A 
    Ostend, 1905  not rated on January 1905 list   2687   -1 (12.5/26, 48%)   = (12/24, 50%) vs 2680-rated opposition   N/A 
    Ostend, 1906  2625 (#16 on January 1906 list)   2728   +4 (8.5/13, 65%)   +4 (7/10, 70%) vs 2646-rated opposition   +2.2 
    ENG-USA cable m corr, 1907  2660 (#12 on January 1907 list)   [2617]   = (0.5/1, 50%)   = (0.5/1, 50%) vs 2738-rated opposition   +0.1 
    Ostend, 1907  2660 (#12 on January 1907 list)   2647   -4 (8/20, 40%)   -4 (8/20, 40%) vs 2713-rated opposition   -0.8 
    St. Petersburg, 1909  2623 (#19 on January 1909 list)   2585   -4 (7.5/19, 39%)   -4 (6/16, 38%) vs 2663-rated opposition   -1.2 
    ENG-USA cable m, 1911  2569 (#25 on January 1911 list)   [2647]   +1 (1/1, 100%)   +1 (1/1, 100%) vs 2701-rated opposition   +0.7 
    Karlsbad, 1911  2569 (#25 on January 1911 list)   2591   -3 (11/25, 44%)   -4 (6/16, 38%) vs 2670-rated opposition   -0.1 
    San Sebastian, 1911  2571 (#26 on February 1911 list)   2600   -4 (5/14, 36%)   -4 (4.5/13, 35%) vs 2703-rated opposition   =0.0 
    Breslau, 1912  2590 (#24 on January 1912 list)   2556   -2 (7.5/17, 44%)   -4 (2.5/9, 28%) vs 2693-rated opposition   -0.9